Advaita, Vishishtadvaita, Dvaita and their siblings — how the great acharyas read the same scriptures and mapped the soul's relation to God.
Vedanta: "The end of the Veda" — the tradition built on Upanishads, Brahma Sutras and Bhagavad Gita (the prasthana-trayi)
Advaita (non-dualism): Adi Shankaracharya, 8th c. — atman and Brahman are absolutely one
Vishishtadvaita (qualified non-dualism): Ramanujacharya, 11th–12th c. — souls and world are the body of the one Lord
Dvaita (dualism): Madhvacharya, 13th c. — soul and God eternally distinct; devotion is the way
Other schools: Shuddhadvaita (Vallabha), Achintya-bheda-abheda (Chaitanya), Bhedabheda (Nimbarka)
One Scripture, Many Readings
Vedanta — "the end of the Veda" — is the family of philosophies built on three foundations (the prasthana-trayi): the Upanishads, the Brahma Sutras that systematise them, and the Bhagavad Gita. Every founding acharya proved his school by writing commentaries on all three. The reason schools multiplied is honest: the Upanishads contain both thundering statements of identity — "That thou art" — and equally clear language of difference, of the soul loving, serving and depending on the Lord. Each school is a disciplined answer to the same question: what exactly is the relation between the individual self (jiva), the world (jagat) and the supreme reality (Brahman/Ishvara)? The debates between them, conducted over a thousand years with formidable rigour, are among the glories of Indian thought — and were carried on, notably, without an inquisition: rivals were refuted, not burned.
Advaita: All Is One
Adi Shankaracharya's Advaita (non-dualism) takes the identity statements at full strength: Brahman alone is real; the world of multiplicity is maya — not a hallucination, but a lower order of reality, like a rope momentarily seen as a snake; and the atman is not part of Brahman or similar to Brahman but simply is Brahman, veiled by ignorance. His famous half-verse compresses it: "brahma satyaṃ jagan mithyā, jīvo brahmaiva nāparaḥ" — Brahman is real, the world is appearance, the soul is nothing other than Brahman. Liberation is therefore knowledge, not travel: nothing needs to be attained, only a mistake needs to be seen through. Personal deities and worship hold an honoured, purifying place at the level of ordinary reality (Shankara himself composed glowing hymns), but the final truth is beyond all form — nirguna, attribute-less. Advaita became the dominant philosophical voice of the tradition and, in the modern era, its best-known export.
Vishishtadvaita and Dvaita: The Reality of Love
Ramanujacharya answered that a pure identity leaves love with no lover and no Beloved. His Vishishtadvaita (qualified non-dualism) reads the "oneness" organically: souls and the world are real, and are the body of the one Lord — Narayana/Vishnu — as inseparably one with Him as body with soul, yet never identical to Him. Maya is not appearance but the Lord's wondrous creative power; liberation is not dissolution but eternal, blissful communion, reached above all through bhakti and sharanagati, total self-surrender — a door Ramanuja deliberately opened to every caste and station. Madhvacharya pressed the difference further: his Dvaita (dualism) declares five eternal distinctions — God from soul, God from matter, soul from soul, soul from matter, matter from matter — with every soul forever dependent on the utterly independent Lord. The later Vaishnava schools shaded the spectrum between: Vallabha's Shuddhadvaita and Chaitanya's achintya-bheda-abheda — "inconceivable difference-and-non-difference" — which powers the Hare Krishna movement's ecstatic devotion today. Seen together, the schools read less like contradiction than like altitude: accounts of the same summit from the paths of knowledge and of love.
Questions
Which school is "correct"?
The tradition never appointed a referee, and its health has lain in the argument itself. A common reconciling view treats the schools as suited to different temperaments and stages — difference as the grammar of devotion, identity as the summit of knowledge. Practising Hindus generally inherit a school through family or sampradaya and worship happily across the lines.
Does Advaita's "world as maya" mean life doesn't matter?
No — Shankara is emphatic that within lived experience the world is fully real and dharma fully binding; maya marks its status only relative to the absolute. The rope-snake is the classic image: the snake is unreal, yet the fright it causes — and the care needed — are real enough while the mistake lasts.
Source: Brahma Sutras with the commentaries of Shankara, Ramanuja and Madhva — presented as an educational overview. Regional versions may vary — this text follows the version most widely used in community worship.